A breast cancer cell dividing under the microscope.

Introduction: Rethinking Cancer

Cancer. The very word can send shivers down one’s spine. For decades, we’ve understood cancer as a genetic disease, a result of DNA mutations causing cells to grow uncontrollably. But what if there’s more to the story? What if we’ve been looking at cancer through too narrow a lens?

As a cancer survivor myself, I’ve journeyed through the labyrinth of conventional treatments and alternative therapies. My experience led me to explore a groundbreaking, although not new, perspective: the metabolic theory of cancer. This theory suggests that cancer might be primarily a disease of cellular metabolism rather than genetic mutations. It’s a view that’s gaining traction in some scientific circles and offers hope for new prevention strategies and treatment options.

But before we dive in, let’s be clear: this article presents a mixture of scientific research and personal experiences. While the metabolic theory of cancer is intriguing, it’s not yet mainstream. Always consult with healthcare professionals before making any changes to your treatment plan. Your journey is unique, and what works for one person may not work for another.

The Metabolic Theory of Cancer: A Paradigm Shift

From Genes to Metabolism: A New Understanding

At the heart of the metabolic theory of cancer is a simple yet revolutionary idea: what if cancer is primarily a disease of cellular energy production?

Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a professor of biology at Boston College, is at the forefront of this theory. His work builds upon the groundbreaking discoveries of Dr. Otto Warburg in the 1920s. Warburg observed that cancer cells tend to ferment glucose for energy, even when oxygen is present – a process known as aerobic glycolysis or the “Warburg effect.”

But why is this important? In normal cells, energy is primarily produced through a process called oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria – the cell’s powerhouses. This process is efficient and produces a lot of energy. Cancer cells, on the other hand, rely heavily on the more primal process of fermentation, which is less efficient but faster.

Dr. Seyfried argues that this metabolic shift isn’t just a symptom of cancer but potentially its root cause. He suggests that damaged mitochondria drive cells to rely on fermentation for energy, leading to the genomic instability we observe in cancer cells i.e. the ideal environment to grow tumours.

The Mitochondria: More Than Just Powerhouses

To understand this theory, we need to appreciate the crucial role of mitochondria in our cells. These tiny organelles do more than just produce energy – they’re involved in cell growth, cell death, (apoptosis)and even the cell’s stress response.

When mitochondria are damaged, it can lead to a cascade of problems:

Reduced energy production
Increased production of reactive oxygen species (free radicals)
Altered cell signaling
Changes in gene expression

All of these factors can contribute to the development and progression of cancer.

Supporting Evidence:

What Does Some Of The Research Say?

While the metabolic theory of cancer is still considered alternative by many in our modern-day medical community, a growing body of research by top scientists & highly respected doctors, supports its key principles:

A 2014 study published in Cell Metabolism found that manipulating cellular metabolism could influence cancer cell growth and survival. The researchers were able to slow tumor growth by targeting specific metabolic pathways.
Research published in Seminars in Cancer Biology in 2017 demonstrated that targeting cancer metabolism could enhance the efficacy of traditional therapies. This suggests that combining metabolic treatments with conventional approaches could lead to better outcomes.
A 2019 review in Nature Reviews Cancer discussed how metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells might be exploited for therapeutic purposes. The authors highlighted several potential targets for drugs that could disrupt cancer cell metabolism..

These findings suggest that addressing cellular metabolism could open new avenues

Alternative Perspectives: Broadening Our Approach

While the metabolic theory offers intriguing possibilities, it’s not the only alternative approach to cancer. Let’s explore some other perspectives that have gained attention:

The Budwig Protocol: Diet as Medicine

Developed by Dr. Johanna Budwig, a German biochemist, in the 1950s, the Budwig protocol is a dietary approach that combines flaxseed oil and cottage cheese – although Quark can also be used effectively. The theory behind this protocol is that it can improve cellular oxygenation and repair – a vital element in the healing journey from any disease, not just cancer.

Dr. Budwig believed that the combination of these foods could help the body produce energy more efficiently and reduce inflammation. While some anecdotal reports suggest benefits, it’s important to note that this protocol hasn’t been extensively studied in clinical trials.

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: Flooding Cancer with Oxygen

Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) involves breathing pure oxygen in a pressurized chamber. The idea behind using HBOT for cancer is based on the observation that cancer cells thrive in low-oxygen environments.

By increasing oxygen levels in the body, HBOT might create an environment less favorable to cancer cells. Some studies have shown that HBOT can enhance the effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy, but more research is needed to fully understand its potential in cancer treatment.

Frequency-based Therapies: Tuning into Healing

Inspired by the work of Dr. Royal Rife in the 1930s, frequency-based therapies use specific electromagnetic frequencies to target cancer cells. The theory is that each type of cell has a unique electromagnetic signature, and by applying the right frequency, you can disrupt cancer cells without harming healthy ones.

In the 1930s, this was a viable treatment that held great promise, it’s important to approach it objectively. The scientific evidence for frequency-based therapies is limited, largely due to vested interests, wanton destruction of vital equipment and threat to livliehood of the doctors who were using it to treat cancer successfullyu; their licenses would be revoked by the AMA– Rife’s microscopes and attempts to suppress the outstanding evidence that was being amassed – which even includes the attempted shooting of and more research is needed to explore the full potential and document efficacy, safety & side effects – although this is not always fully documented in mainstream medicine; many clinical trials do not even include women and yet they are in ‘standard’ medications around the world. I also learned that between 1934-’39 in the California/San Diego area, hundreds of people were cured of all manna of cancers in clinics using ‘frequency medicine’ as it was termed – even very advanced patients who were deemed ‘terminal’ – were restored to health within 3-6 months. Not only cancer, but cataracts, herpes and other diseases. If more had been done to support this treatment, instead of being suppressed, maligned and vilified by vested interests, we could have spared the lives and sufferings of millions of people. You can learn more of this in ‘further reading’ in “The Cancer Cure That Worked” by Barry Lynes.

Ancient Wisdom: Lessons from Traditional Medicine

Long before modern medicine, traditional healing systems like Chinese and Ayurvedic medicine offered holistic approaches to health and disease. These systems view cancer not as a localized problem but as a sign of imbalance in the entire body.

Chinese medicine, for example, focuses on restoring the balance of Qi (life energy) and addressing underlying imbalances that might contribute to cancer. Ayurvedic medicine emphasizes the importance of diet, lifestyle, and herbal remedies to support the body’s natural healing processes.

While these approaches haven’t been extensively studied using modern scientific methods, they offer valuable perspectives on holistic health that can complement conventional treatments. It is worth asking ourselves why these methods are NOT being studied when there is such a weight of evidence that warrants such investigation.

My Journey: From Diagnosis to Discovery

When I was diagnosed with cancer, my world turned upside down. [Brief description of personal experience, emphasizing the emotional and physical challenges faced.]

I refused conventional treatments that were offered at the time due to the poor outcome statistics; (Cochrane) 1) chemotherapy – which is a poison based on mustard gas that destroys the immune system and potentially, reduces our ability to recover from any secondary cancers – and 2) radiotherapy – again, the results were not good enough, in my opinion, to subject my body to such a harsh treatment. I found myself intuitively drawn to exploring other approaches; approaches with a long history of efficacy and usage before the 1920s when Carnegie & Rockefeller rewrote medical textbooks in their drive to move into pharmaceuticals – they wanted to control the kind of teaching and funded the medical wings of prominent, US seats of learning stringently controlling the syllabuses which dismissed & suppressed all holistic treatments. It’s worth noting that since my own research of bio-medicine and the processes involved in disease that if I had my time again, I would even refuse a mastectomy as a ‘treatment’ for my cancer.

Voices of Hope: Other Survivors’ Stories

Every cancer journey is unique, and what works for one person may not work for another. It is, however, in every cancer patient’s interest, to explore all options – many of which have been successful and yet not broadcast in mainstream news or printed media. Not so for Dr. Veronique Desaulniers, who has healed herself from breast cancer with natural and holistic treatments and protocols not once but TWICE! You can hear her story here! Don’t Miss It!

The Gender Gap in Clinical Trials

It’s worth mentioning that many clinical trials have historically excluded women, potentially affecting our understanding of how treatments work across genders. According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, women were poorly represented in clinical trials until the 1990s. This gender gap may well have implications for treatment efficacy and side effects in female patients.

For example, a study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology in 2019 found that women were more likely to experience severe side effects from chemotherapy than men. This highlights the importance of inclusive research practices and personalized treatment approaches.

The Cochrane Collaboration: A Source of Objective Data

The Cochrane Collaboration, crucially, is an independent organization that conducts systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, provides valuable insights into cancer treatment outcomes. Their analyses of 5-year survival rates offer a balanced view of treatment efficacy.

For instance, a Cochrane review on breast cancer treatments found that while chemotherapy may improve survival rates, the benefits vary depending on the specific type of cancer and the patient’s individual characteristics. This underscores the importance of personalized treatment plans.

Integrative Oncology: The Best of Both Worlds?

The most promising approach may be to view alternative therapies as complementary to, rather than replacements for, conventional treatments. This is the foundation of integrative oncology, which combines evidence-based conventional treatments with carefully selected complementary therapies.

Integrative oncology could still be considered something of a ‘blunt instrument’ as the side effects can be worse than many of the cancer symptoms and often require counter-therapy i.e. further, synthetic drugs to manage the disruption caused by the primary drugs

It is claimed that integrative oncology aims to:

Reduce side effects of conventional treatments – the natural (alternative) treatments are often responsible for this benefit as they are not synthetic and do not work against the body.
Improve quality of life – although the effects of chemotherapy often have the opposite effect.
Support the body’s natural healing processes – although with a denuded immune system, it’s hard to imagine that this is best practice
Address the emotional and spiritual aspects of healing

It is advisable to discuss any alternative therapies you’re considering with your healthcare team; if they are knowledgeable in these therapies, they may help you understand potential benefits and possible risks – they will also ensure that any complementary treatments don’t interfere with your primary cancer care – but again, little or no research is done on the cumulative effects of ‘standard’ mainstream treatments so there is an anomaly and possibly even a double standard at work in this instance.

Lifestyle Considerations: Empowering Your Health

Beyond specific treatments, lifestyle factors play a crucial role in cancer prevention and management. Let’s explore some key areas where you can take charge of your health:

Emotional Health and Stress Management

Chronic stress can negatively impact our immune system and overall health. The mind-body connection is powerful, and nurturing your emotional wellbeing can support your physical health.

Consider these stress-management techniques:

Meditation and mindfulness practices
Yoga or tai chi
Journaling
Professional counseling or support groups
Art or music therapy

Family Relationships and Social Support

Strong social connections can significantly impact cancer outcomes. A study published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology found that cancer patients with strong social support had better survival rates and quality of life.

Nurture your relationships by:

Open communication with loved ones about your needs and feelings
Joining cancer support groups
Participating in community activities
Volunteering or helping others, which can provide a sense of purpose

Work-Life Balance: Managing Stress in the Modern World

Chronic work stress may contribute to inflammation and weakened immunity. Striving for a healthy work-life balance is essential for overall health and wellbeing.

Consider these strategies:

Set clear boundaries between work and personal time
Practice time management techniques
Communicate with your employer about your health needs
Explore flexible work options if available
Make time for hobbies and activities you enjoy

Diet and Nutrition: Fueling Your Body for Health

A balanced diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains may help support overall health and potentially influence cancer metabolism. Some studies suggest that certain dietary approaches, like intermittent fasting, might enhance the effects of cancer treatments.

Key dietary considerations:

Emphasize plant-based foods
Choose whole grains over refined grains
Limit processed foods and added sugars
Stay hydrated
Consider working with a registered dietitian who specializes in oncology nutrition

Physical Activity: Moving for Life

Regular exercise has been shown to improve outcomes for cancer patients and may help prevent recurrence in survivors. A meta-analysis published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine found that higher levels of physical activity were associated with lower risk of several types of cancer.

Incorporate movement into your life:

Start with gentle activities like walking or swimming
Gradually increase intensity and duration as you’re able
Try strength training to maintain muscle mass
Consider mind-body exercises like yoga or Pilates
Always consult with your healthcare team before starting a new exercise program

Ethical Consuming: Health Beyond Your Plate

Choosing organic, locally-sourced foods and products with minimal environmental impact aligns with a holistic approach to health and may reduce exposure to potential carcinogens.

Consider these practices:

Choose organic produce when possible
Support local farmers and producers
Reduce use of plastic and other potentially harmful materials
Use natural cleaning and personal care products
Be mindful of your environmental impact

Conclusion: Empowering Your Cancer Journey

The metabolic theory of cancer offers an intriguing perspective, potentially opening new avenues for prevention and treatment.

Every person’s cancer journey is unique – what works for one individual may not work for another. The key is to stay informed, communicate with your healthcare team, and take a holistic approach to research and health – but please do your own, verifiable research – there are many hidden gems among the archives of medical facilities.

From cutting-edge metabolic research to ancient healing wisdom, we can broaden our understanding of cancer and potentially unlock new paths to healing. Approach new information critically & discuss any changes with professionals but bear in mind, that they have probably not been trained in more than one hour of nutrition in 7 years of study.

Your journey with cancer is not just about navigating a disease – it’s about reclaiming health, honestly appraising what needs to change in your life, rediscovering your strength, & perhaps even finding new purpose. Whether you’re currently living with cancer, supporting a loved one, or simply interested in prevention, remember that knowledge is power. Use this information as a starting point for your own research and discussions with healthcare professionals – especially holistic practitioners.

Together, we can change the conversation around cancer – from one of fear to one of empowerment, hope, and holistic healing.

Disclaimers and Ethical Statements

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. The views expressed are personal opinions based on research and personal experience. Always consult with qualified, fully informed healthcare professionals before making any changes to your treatment plan or lifestyle but it is in your interest to review all evidence that could positively affect your survival and other desired outcomes.

The mention of specific alternative therapies may not imply endorsement. These approaches may not have been subjected to the same rigorous testing as conventional treatments and may carry risks. Never delay or forego conventional medical treatment in favor of alternative therapies without consulting your healthcare team. Many people are fearful of a cancer diagnosis and will opt to take all manna of help whether mainstream, ancient, holistic, alternative and even, experimental.

The personal story included in this article is an individual’s experiences and should not be taken as definitive evidence of treatment efficacy – but when you consider that Dr. Johanna Budwig documented a (more than) 90% success rate of curing even ‘terminal’ cancer patients, it is in the interest of every patient to weigh this information before engaging in any treatment program. Unfortunately, most people will not be told about the success of The Budwig Protocol because your mainstream doctor will not be trained in it – nor about the success of Royal Rife, who’s laboratory was ransacked, his machine destroyed and his colleagues threatened, bribed and shot at with firearms.

Every person’s cancer journey is unique, and outcomes can vary widely whether you opt for so-called ‘standard’ treatment, or something different – but it’s as well to remember that cancer incidence and suffering is still on the rise – largely, because successful treatments were suppressed and wrongfully discredited, we need as many tools to choose from to give ourselves the very best chance of survival and optimal health. It was a particularly unfortunate alignment of events, choices, egos and preservation of reputations at any cost – despite there being evidence that proved that we had the chance to embrace and adopt a “cure for cancer that worked.”

Wishing You Well!

Warrior Women Hope

References and Further Reading

Lynes, Barry (1987) “The Cancer Cure That Worked”
Seyfried, T. N. (2012). Cancer as a metabolic disease: On the origin, management, and prevention of cancer. John Wiley & Sons.
Warburg, O. (1956). On the origin of cancer cells. Science, 123(3191), 309-314.
Budwig, J. (2011). The Budwig cancer & coronary heart disease prevention diet: The revolutionary diet from Dr. Johanna Budwig. Freedom Press.
Poff, A. M., et al. (2020). Metabolic interventions for cancer: A comprehensive review. Metabolism, 113, 154401.
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. (Various dates). [Relevant reviews on cancer treatments]
Liu, J., et al. (2019). Acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37(15_suppl), e23164-e23164.
Abrams, D. I., & Weil, A. T. (2014). Integrative oncology. Oxford University Press.
Frenkel, M., et al. (2020). Integrating dietary supplements into cancer care. Integrative Cancer Therapies, 19, 1534735420928313.
Carlson, L. E. (2021). Mindfulness-based interventions for coping with cancer. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1489(1), 52-64.
Andersen, B. L., et al. (2021). Psychological intervention and survival in breast cancer: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 39(15_suppl), 12075-12075.

CANCER – Is It A Metabolic Disease?